|Boeing is looking at its 737-700 airframe as the Air Force's next-generation JSTARS
Defense Systems News
War on ISIS Not Likely to Reverse Downward Military Budgets
U.S. Air Force Scrimps On JSTARS Recap Program
Boeing Eyes 737-700 Solution for New JSTARS
Indonesia Muscles Up Its Military
JLTV Vendors: We are ready for production
GD wins $1.5 billion contract to support nuclear subs
First Flight for KC-46 Tanker Platform Slips Further
New Sanctions Target Russia's Energy and Finance Sectors; Defense Industry Also in Crosshairs
Engine Makers Pushing AM, Other Technologies For RD-180 Replacement
France to evaluate M-345 as possible Alpha Jet replacement
Israeli military inflates aerostat demand
Unmanned Aircraft Systems at a Crossroads
House Delays Vote on Continuing Resolution, passage expected week of 15 September
Inside the Beltway
asked Todd Harrison, Senior Fellow and defense budget guru at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (CSBA) what he thought the the increased international turmoil -- Ukraine, Israel, Iraq -- meant for U.S. defense spending
and the prospects for overturning/postponing the Budget Control Act (BCA) and sequestration. Here's what he offered:
far, I don’t see much movement on lifting the BCA budget caps, even given the increasingly unstable strategic environment
around the world. I think it’s important to remember how the BCA came into effect in the first place. It
was not intended to constrain U.S. foreign policy or reduce the size of the military—although that has happened.
The defense budget was the hostage taken by both sides in the showdown over the deficit. Republicans thought Democrats
would be unwilling to cut defense spending because they could look weak on defense. Democrats thought Republicans wouldn’t
let defense be cut because that’s the one area of the federal budget they want to see increased. As one might
expect, when both sides take the same hostage it doesn’t work out well for the hostage.
we have the BCA budget caps has nothing to do with the security environment, so it should not be surprising that as the security
environment worsens it doesn’t seem to affect the debate of defense spending. There is also a convenient loophole
written into the law–anything Congress appropriates as supplement “war-related” funding does not count against
the budget caps. So if more money is needed for operations in Iraq or elsewhere, Congress can fund that without changing
Defense Systems Personnel
|Lt. Gen. Joseph Votel, left, Adm. Bill Gortney, center, and Gen. John Campbell, right.
| Defense News notes that the Pentagon on recently announced a major change at the top of its training, counterterrorism and homeland security
efforts, naming new heads US Special Operations and Northern Command, along with a new leader of the NATO force in Afghanistan: -- Navy Adm. Bill Gortney, head of Fleet Forces Command, has been nominated to lead US Northern Command and North American Aerospace Defense Command.
He would replace Army Gen. Charles Jacoby. -- Army Gen. John Campbell, vice chief of staff of the Army, has been nominated to lead the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan.
He would replace Marine Gen. Joseph Dunford, who has been nominated to be the next Marine Corps commandant. -- Army Lt. Gen. Joseph Votel has been nominated to receive a fourth star and to take over US Special Operations Command. He is the head of Joint
Special Operations Command (JSOC). He would replace Adm. William McRaven, who is retiring.
Defense Systems Conference
UAS Commercialization Industry Conference (UASCIC) will bring together a group of early adopters, government officials, industry
partners and expert academia to discuss their current trials, future requirements, extensive capabilities, and forthcoming
plans to leverage Unmanned Aerial Systems in commercial markets. To be held 17-19 November 2014 in Washington DC, all of the details are here.